Re-gear

Redjeep8901
BSJ 101 Planning Commitee
Posts: 17
Joined: Fri Aug 21, 2015 11:15 am
Jeep Year: 2009
Jeep Model: JK Wrangler

Re-gear

Unread post by Redjeep8901 »

Ok looking for some feedback on this one. I have a 2009 jk with 35's, I plan on keeping this jeep for as long as humanly possible. I got the jeep with the tow package and am currently running 3.73's. My next set of tires will be 37's (I just got the 35's so this is a while down the road) but in the mean time my next big purchase I am saving for are e-lockers. The people I am talking to said I am going to want to run higher gears because it's going to feel like a dog with 37's on it......I don't have a problem right now with the 35's plenty of power and driving like Mrs. Daisy is in the jeep , but should I be looking to re gear before I start to think about lockers? If I do re-gear I am only thinking 4.10's as I still want this to have good street manners (hence the selectable lockers). In the past I ran a stock axle TJ with a Dana 35 and 35's waiting for it to break and It never did, these same people told me I couldn't do that, but I did (I know I was pushing it though) are they just trying to sell me stuff I don't need, is it time to find a new shop to buy my parts (do most work myself), or is a re-gear necessary? I don't have a ton of money to dump into my jeep (2year old, and 120 year old house), but am willing to save and spend in the correct places. Thanks for any info......
User avatar
RalphTomaccio
BSJ 101 Planning Commitee
Posts: 1251
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2013 9:50 am
Jeep Year: 2012
Jeep Model: JK Wrangler
Location: Slatersville RI

Re: Re-gear

Unread post by RalphTomaccio »

I am not, by any means, an expert on this subject, but am learning as I slowly build my JKU, also with 3.73's. Larger tires is high on my list of "next mods" and would like to avoid having to regear. From what I have learned, there are probably a lot of people that are going to tell you you should have regeared when you went to 35's. I would say that going to 37's, yes, definitely regear.
User avatar
Hoodoo Man
BSJ 101 Planning Commitee
Posts: 3799
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 11:29 am
Jeep Year: 1970
Jeep Model: C101
Real Name: Jeff Cambray
Location: Westford MA

Re: Re-gear

Unread post by Hoodoo Man »

It would be a waste of money to go to 4.10 from 3.73.. A 4:88 or 5.13 would be recommended for 37s, new gears won't hurt street manners at all, it will help keep the jeep moving down the highway with ease.. IIRC the JKs all use the same carrier so its not like the TJ where there is a carrier break and all but if you can afford to do it all at once it makes sense to do the lockers with the re-gear... In the end its your jeep and your money but the cost of going to 4.10s wont be worth it for the benefit you get...
1970 Jeepster- stock
2003 Jeep Rubicon 2" BDS Spring lift 35s and MCE fenders
2012 Jeep JKU 2.5' Terafkex spring lift, Rock Hard Bumpa, skids, BodyArmor4x4 sliders..
Spudcannons
BSJ 101 Planning Commitee
Posts: 231
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2015 2:11 pm
Jeep Year: 2013
Jeep Model: JK Wrangler

Re: Re-gear

Unread post by Spudcannons »

you would want 5.13 with the 3.8l to have it accelerate at a normal pace. I'm running 4.88 with 37s but I have a 2013 with the 3.6l.
JKU Commando- I've tinkered with her a tiny bit.
User avatar
ASauer17
BSJ BOD President
Posts: 3151
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2011 12:32 pm
Jeep Year: 1998
Jeep Model: TJ Wrangler
Real Name: Amanda
Location: Hubbardston ma

Re: Re-gear

Unread post by ASauer17 »

I ran 35s on my TJ with a d44 for maybe... 3 years. I regeared to 4.88
98/99 TJ
2025 President
----------------------------------------
2023 & 2024 President
2021 Director of Events
2018 Secretary
2016 & 2017 President
2014 & 2015 Secretary
Yipjeep
BSJ 101 Planning Commitee
Posts: 65
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2014 3:16 pm
Jeep Model: JK Wrangler

Re: Re-gear

Unread post by Yipjeep »

The 3.21s in the JKs use a different carrier; however, 3.73 and up use the same carrier. I thought the same thing as Ralph. Surprised you didn't need to regear for the 35's. I've heard many complain about the pre-2012 JKs being bogged down with larger tires. Seems those pre-2012 opt to go to 4.88 or 5.13, but that discussion is when talking about 35s. I'd also be concerned about the front needing sleeves and gussets to support the 37's. More experienced folks can chime in on the importance if JK is just crawling around a mall or bouncing around rocks.
User avatar
schwalby
BSJ 101 Planning Commitee
Posts: 1677
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 1:38 pm
Jeep Year: 2003
Jeep Model: TJ Wrangler
Real Name: Josh (Wife is Jen)
Location: Northwood NH

Re: Re-gear

Unread post by schwalby »

Go 4.88. We just got 37s on our 2015 and it does just fine on the street, pretty easy to go too fast actually. And when coming off the line I have to be careful to not give it too much gas.

You can also use the same carrier when going to 4.88s, anything after that does need a new carrier.
Josh Schwalb
ArticRubi wrote:Remember: poor planning on my part constitutes an emergency on yours.
Redjeep8901
BSJ 101 Planning Commitee
Posts: 17
Joined: Fri Aug 21, 2015 11:15 am
Jeep Year: 2009
Jeep Model: JK Wrangler

Re: Re-gear

Unread post by Redjeep8901 »

Forgive me for sounding uneducated, never dealt with lockers before, but when adding a locker does that not replace the carrier?
Redjeep8901
BSJ 101 Planning Commitee
Posts: 17
Joined: Fri Aug 21, 2015 11:15 am
Jeep Year: 2009
Jeep Model: JK Wrangler

Re: Re-gear

Unread post by Redjeep8901 »

Now I am thinking 4.88...... E lockers and 30 spline front shafts...... Someone told me to try to find a used rubicon 44, but a built 30 has the same or more strength than a rubicon 44 at less cost
User avatar
RalphTomaccio
BSJ 101 Planning Commitee
Posts: 1251
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2013 9:50 am
Jeep Year: 2012
Jeep Model: JK Wrangler
Location: Slatersville RI

Re: Re-gear

Unread post by RalphTomaccio »

Here's a chart you may find useful:

Image
User avatar
schwalby
BSJ 101 Planning Commitee
Posts: 1677
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 1:38 pm
Jeep Year: 2003
Jeep Model: TJ Wrangler
Real Name: Josh (Wife is Jen)
Location: Northwood NH

Re: Re-gear

Unread post by schwalby »

delete
Last edited by schwalby on Thu Apr 07, 2016 2:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Josh Schwalb
ArticRubi wrote:Remember: poor planning on my part constitutes an emergency on yours.
User avatar
schwalby
BSJ 101 Planning Commitee
Posts: 1677
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 1:38 pm
Jeep Year: 2003
Jeep Model: TJ Wrangler
Real Name: Josh (Wife is Jen)
Location: Northwood NH

Re: Re-gear

Unread post by schwalby »

Redjeep8901 wrote:Forgive me for sounding uneducated, never dealt with lockers before, but when adding a locker does that not replace the carrier?
A locker does replace the carrier but someone mentioned it so I thought I would confirm. Sorry for any confusion.
Redjeep8901 wrote:Now I am thinking 4.88...... E lockers and 30 spline front shafts...... Someone told me to try to find a used rubicon 44, but a built 30 has the same or more strength than a rubicon 44 at less cost

Personally I wouldn't put any money into a D30. You can make them stronger but they are still a weaker axle from the start. I have done some research and a lot of people of wheeled 37s with a D30 but you have to be careful with it. On our JK and our TJ I hope to go to D44s before locking.

Others can correct me but I believe adding a locker to any axle can put more stress on it also.
Josh Schwalb
ArticRubi wrote:Remember: poor planning on my part constitutes an emergency on yours.
User avatar
Kurt
BSJ Member
Posts: 4209
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 11:53 am
Jeep Year: 1992
Jeep Model: YJ Wrangler
Real Name: Kurt K.
Location: Pepperell, MA

Re: Re-gear

Unread post by Kurt »

schwalby wrote:Others can correct me but I believe adding a locker to any axle can put more stress on it also.
Absolutely correct
Without a locker (or a locker that is unlocked) the torque on the axle is limited to the tire with the LEAST traction. The toque is split 50/50 between the two tires (and axle shafts, u-joints, etc)

When the axle is locked all the torque can be on the tire with the MOST traction. The result can be that ALL the torque is applied to a single tire and it's axle shaft and u-joint are under 100% of the applied torque. Much more stress (torque) is possible on the axle components when locked.
"Build It, Run It, Break It, Improve It, Repeat!"
NEA Treasurer 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020
BSJ Treasurer 2020
User avatar
schwalby
BSJ 101 Planning Commitee
Posts: 1677
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 1:38 pm
Jeep Year: 2003
Jeep Model: TJ Wrangler
Real Name: Josh (Wife is Jen)
Location: Northwood NH

Re: Re-gear

Unread post by schwalby »

WooHoo I got it right!!
Josh Schwalb
ArticRubi wrote:Remember: poor planning on my part constitutes an emergency on yours.
User avatar
DDewar53
BSJ 101 Planning Commitee
Posts: 927
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 3:41 pm
Jeep Year: 1990
Jeep Model: YJ Wrangler

Re: Re-gear

Unread post by DDewar53 »

In my opinion - while a locker puts more stress on axle internals, open diffs are easier to break. This is because most axles break when the wheel starts spinning, the axle hops a little, then the spinning wheel suddenly gets traction. It stops - with all of that power still going to it, and that's how axle internals break. Less chance of spinning and wheel hopping with a locked axle, at least in my experience.

before the flames start - Tthis is my opinion based on my experience. YMMV
Pacifism is a shifty doctrine under which a man accepts the benefits of the social group without being willing to pay - and claims a halo for his dishonesty.

Robert A. Heinlein
Post Reply