Spring Eye Bushings

User avatar
Frank
Frankie BSJ Member
Posts: 4145
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2009 8:54 am
Jeep Year: 1974
Jeep Model: CJ5

Spring Eye Bushings

Unread post by Frank »

I have polly now , and have a lot of torque steer from the rear. My old bushings were rubber. If you horsed it on or off the throttle you would get it slightly. Now its major ! I thought the polly bushings were supposed to be stiffer ?? Do you know where I can get rubber bushings ? The axle is still spring under. Thanks FjR68
User avatar
ZAEDOCK
BSJ Member
Posts: 2428
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 11:18 am
Jeep Year: 1992
Jeep Model: YJ Wrangler

Re: Spring Eye Bushings

Unread post by ZAEDOCK »

Torque steer from a SUA rear?

Sounds like something else is borken.
Carl McFly wrote:X2, I agree with Joe. And not just because he's man candy
BSJ President 2003 - 2005
User avatar
Frank
Frankie BSJ Member
Posts: 4145
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2009 8:54 am
Jeep Year: 1974
Jeep Model: CJ5

Re: Spring Eye Bushings

Unread post by Frank »

Every thing is brand new, springs , mounts, bushings,U-bolts. I think its flexing the polly joints. Looking out the side, on engagement of the clutch it will chatter the tires as I have a bent finger in the pressure plate. When you throttle into it you can see the wheel move forward and if you let off quickly you can see it move rearward. I have 35 # of torque on the mount and shackle bolts. I had 3 in springs now 4in . Dont know if that matters. I hate it ! Thanks FjR68
DOUG
BSJ Member
Posts: 1167
Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 5:07 pm
Jeep Year: 2020
Jeep Model: JT Gladiator
Location: Portsmouth, NH

Re: Spring Eye Bushings

Unread post by DOUG »

How are the locater pins? Maybe one is broken.
2022 Gladiator Rubicon
User avatar
ZAEDOCK
BSJ Member
Posts: 2428
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 11:18 am
Jeep Year: 1992
Jeep Model: YJ Wrangler

Re: Spring Eye Bushings

Unread post by ZAEDOCK »

Frank, poly bushings should have less movement than rubber. I would also check the center pins. A borken one would cause fore/aft movement.
Carl McFly wrote:X2, I agree with Joe. And not just because he's man candy
BSJ President 2003 - 2005
User avatar
Frank
Frankie BSJ Member
Posts: 4145
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2009 8:54 am
Jeep Year: 1974
Jeep Model: CJ5

Re: Spring Eye Bushings

Unread post by Frank »

I actually replaced the brand new ones with brand new longer ones to accept the 4 degree shims. I had to drill out the frame mounts to accept 9/16th bolts instead of the 1/2 bolts. I dont get it but after vacation I will look at everything again. Thanks DUDES ! FjR68
User avatar
Frank
Frankie BSJ Member
Posts: 4145
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2009 8:54 am
Jeep Year: 1974
Jeep Model: CJ5

Re: Spring Eye Bushings

Unread post by Frank »

I talked with the Mfg of the spring and they said I didnt get the sleeves that go through the bushings at the frame mounts. They sent me 4 nice gold looking ones that fit the 9/16th bolts but no way in bell are they going through the bushings ! The bolt is fairly tight to begin with and is why I thought they didnt need sleeves. Whats an idiot to do ???? Am I right to think there should be a sleeve or not. FjR68
User avatar
Kurt
BSJ Member
Posts: 4209
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 11:53 am
Jeep Year: 1992
Jeep Model: YJ Wrangler
Real Name: Kurt K.
Location: Pepperell, MA

Re: Spring Eye Bushings

Unread post by Kurt »

I've always had sleeves in the bushing in the rigs I've messed with.
Maybe some lube and a BFH will get'm in there
"Build It, Run It, Break It, Improve It, Repeat!"
NEA Treasurer 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020
BSJ Treasurer 2020
User avatar
ZAEDOCK
BSJ Member
Posts: 2428
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 11:18 am
Jeep Year: 1992
Jeep Model: YJ Wrangler

Re: Spring Eye Bushings

Unread post by ZAEDOCK »

The bolts should be antisiezed when installed into the sleeves. The sleeves are tightened down and aren't supposed to move. The bushing should be lubed where the sleeve goes through to promote movement and flex. If you don't use a sleeve, the bolt will wear the bushing down in short order and cause fore/aft axle movement.
Carl McFly wrote:X2, I agree with Joe. And not just because he's man candy
BSJ President 2003 - 2005
Post Reply