New sneakers...
-
- BSJ Member
- Posts: 1167
- Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 5:07 pm
- Jeep Year: 2020
- Jeep Model: JT Gladiator
- Location: Portsmouth, NH
New sneakers...
New tires for the Scrambler, 36/13.50/15 Iroks. Sweet deal including the wheels, which happen to be the right BP for the Waggy axles. Problem is the wheels are 10" wide, compared to the 8" wheels I have now they are going to stick out quite a bit.
My question is, can these tires be squeezed on an 8" wheel?
If not, I was thinking of having these wheels converted to beadlocks and running them.
Thoughts?
My question is, can these tires be squeezed on an 8" wheel?
If not, I was thinking of having these wheels converted to beadlocks and running them.
Thoughts?
2022 Gladiator Rubicon
- ZAEDOCK
- BSJ Member
- Posts: 2428
- Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 11:18 am
- Jeep Year: 1992
- Jeep Model: YJ Wrangler
Re: New sneakers...
Nice Doug! Irok's will be my next tire choice too.
I would squeeze 13.5" wide tire onto an 8" rim, although at this point I would try the 10's out and see how they go.
I run my 15.5" tires on 15x10's and they hold great (as you know from Moab).
I would squeeze 13.5" wide tire onto an 8" rim, although at this point I would try the 10's out and see how they go.
I run my 15.5" tires on 15x10's and they hold great (as you know from Moab).
BSJ President 2003 - 2005Carl McFly wrote:X2, I agree with Joe. And not just because he's man candy
- ArticRubi
- BSJ 101 Planning Commitee
- Posts: 690
- Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 5:02 pm
- Jeep Year: 2008
- Jeep Model: JK Wrangler
Re: New sneakers...
Should be fine on the 10" wide. I run a 35x12.50 on an 18x9" wide rim. Optimal footprint for me is at about 8 psi, and I haven't lost a bead yet.
Question, what up with everyone having a hard-on for 15" rims around here? I know my 18" is a bit tall, and were selected for purposes of highway stability, but even when I go off DD status with my rig and run bead locks I'm still going to need a 17" rim to accomodate my brakes.
Question, what up with everyone having a hard-on for 15" rims around here? I know my 18" is a bit tall, and were selected for purposes of highway stability, but even when I go off DD status with my rig and run bead locks I'm still going to need a 17" rim to accomodate my brakes.
Re: New sneakers...
15" is a common / historical wheel size for Jeeps and the tires & wheels tend to be cheaper. That may be changing slowly though as larger wheel sizes are more common for newer model years now.ArticRubi wrote:Question, what up with everyone having a hard-on for 15" rims around here? I know my 18" is a bit tall, and were selected for purposes of highway stability, but even when I go off DD status with my rig and run bead locks I'm still going to need a 17" rim to accomodate my brakes.
JW
- Modeler
- BSJ Member
- Posts: 980
- Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2010 5:37 pm
- Jeep Year: 2005
- Jeep Model: LJ Wrangler
Re: New sneakers...
TJs and earlier can generally get away with a 15" wheel. What I don't understand is how the tire companies can be charging so much more for a tire with a bigger hole in it.
Less material=more money, I guess they're actually bikinis.
Less material=more money, I guess they're actually bikinis.
Speed costs money, how slow do you want to go?
- ZAEDOCK
- BSJ Member
- Posts: 2428
- Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 11:18 am
- Jeep Year: 1992
- Jeep Model: YJ Wrangler
Re: New sneakers...
The letters on the sidewall are bigger and look cooler.ArticRubi wrote:Question, what up with everyone having a hard-on for 15" rims around here? I know my 18" is a bit tall, and were selected for purposes of highway stability, but even when I go off DD status with my rig and run bead locks I'm still going to need a 17" rim to accomodate my brakes.
BSJ President 2003 - 2005Carl McFly wrote:X2, I agree with Joe. And not just because he's man candy
Re: New sneakers...
Depends on the sales volume more than the materials for most tires (unless they are using a special process/material). Manufacturing different sizes means having to offset their fixed manufacturing costs for each size which requires different tooling, process, inventory space, etc... If they are producing/selling smaller volumes the materials cost difference isn't the significant driver of end price -- the other costs are. Because 15" wheels have historically been one of the most common sizes they were produced in the most volume for the largest market and could be sold at a lower price point.Modeler wrote:TJs and earlier can generally get away with a 15" wheel. What I don't understand is how the tire companies can be charging so much more for a tire with a bigger hole in it.
Less material=more money, I guess they're actually bikinis.
As vehicles with larger wheel sizes are more standard then you'll see the price points shift as the sales volumes shift towards larger wheels.
On the trail a taller sidewall is going to offer more/better flex, so if offroad performance is the primary concern you'd be better off with a 15" tire/wheel rather than stepping up to a larger wheel size.
JW
- 88jeepxj
- BSJ 101 Planning Commitee
- Posts: 188
- Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 10:13 am
- Jeep Year: 1999
- Jeep Model: XJ Cherokee
Re: New sneakers...
I'd love to find a good deal on 31 or 32 inch MT tires so my XJ can have new sneakers! The BFG ATs are an amazing all around tire, but I don't need an all around tire anymore.
So yeah, let me know if anybody finds a good deal!
So yeah, let me know if anybody finds a good deal!
- Modeler
- BSJ Member
- Posts: 980
- Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2010 5:37 pm
- Jeep Year: 2005
- Jeep Model: LJ Wrangler
Re: New sneakers...
John, you're thinking too logically. It was said for humor and must have failed. <hangs head in shame>nostaw wrote:Depends on the sales volume more than the materials for most tires (unless they are using a special process/material). Manufacturing different sizes means having to offset their fixed manufacturing costs for each size which requires different tooling, process, inventory space, etc... If they are producing/selling smaller volumes the materials cost difference isn't the significant driver of end price -- the other costs are. Because 15" wheels have historically been one of the most common sizes they were produced in the most volume for the largest market and could be sold at a lower price point.Modeler wrote:TJs and earlier can generally get away with a 15" wheel. What I don't understand is how the tire companies can be charging so much more for a tire with a bigger hole in it.
Less material=more money, I guess they're actually bikinis.
As vehicles with larger wheel sizes are more standard then you'll see the price points shift as the sales volumes shift towards larger wheels.
On the trail a taller sidewall is going to offer more/better flex, so if offroad performance is the primary concern you'd be better off with a 15" tire/wheel rather than stepping up to a larger wheel size.
JW
Speed costs money, how slow do you want to go?
-
- BSJ Member
- Posts: 1167
- Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 5:07 pm
- Jeep Year: 2020
- Jeep Model: JT Gladiator
- Location: Portsmouth, NH
Re: New sneakers...
I got it.Modeler wrote:John, you're thinking too logically. It was said for humor and must have failed. <hangs head in shame>nostaw wrote:Depends on the sales volume more than the materials for most tires (unless they are using a special process/material). Manufacturing different sizes means having to offset their fixed manufacturing costs for each size which requires different tooling, process, inventory space, etc... If they are producing/selling smaller volumes the materials cost difference isn't the significant driver of end price -- the other costs are. Because 15" wheels have historically been one of the most common sizes they were produced in the most volume for the largest market and could be sold at a lower price point.Modeler wrote:TJs and earlier can generally get away with a 15" wheel. What I don't understand is how the tire companies can be charging so much more for a tire with a bigger hole in it.
Less material=more money, I guess they're actually bikinis.
As vehicles with larger wheel sizes are more standard then you'll see the price points shift as the sales volumes shift towards larger wheels.
On the trail a taller sidewall is going to offer more/better flex, so if offroad performance is the primary concern you'd be better off with a 15" tire/wheel rather than stepping up to a larger wheel size.
JW
2022 Gladiator Rubicon
-
- BSJ 101 Planning Commitee
- Posts: 371
- Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 12:07 pm
- Jeep Model: CJ3B
- Location: STILL DREAMMING OF MOAB!!
Re: New sneakers...
Nice find doug
[
quote="ArticRubi"]Should be fine on the 10" wide. I run a 35x12.50 on an 18x9" wide rim. Optimal footprint for me is at about 8 psi, and I haven't lost a bead yet.
Question, what up with everyone having a hard-on for 15" rims around here? I know my 18" is a bit tall, and were selected for purposes of highway stability, but even when I go off DD status with my rig and run bead locks I'm still going to need a 17" rim to accomodate my brakes.[/quote]
Rule of thumb rim size should be less than 1/2 tire size, more sidewall flex.
[
quote="ArticRubi"]Should be fine on the 10" wide. I run a 35x12.50 on an 18x9" wide rim. Optimal footprint for me is at about 8 psi, and I haven't lost a bead yet.
Question, what up with everyone having a hard-on for 15" rims around here? I know my 18" is a bit tall, and were selected for purposes of highway stability, but even when I go off DD status with my rig and run bead locks I'm still going to need a 17" rim to accomodate my brakes.[/quote]
Rule of thumb rim size should be less than 1/2 tire size, more sidewall flex.
New sneakers...
Sorry... I'm an engineer... I take things literally...Modeler wrote:
John, you're thinking too logically. It was said for humor and must have failed. <hangs head in shame>
JW
- Modeler
- BSJ Member
- Posts: 980
- Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2010 5:37 pm
- Jeep Year: 2005
- Jeep Model: LJ Wrangler
Re: New sneakers...
No problem. I have to deal with Hardware Engineers, Software Engineers and Field Service Engineers all day, I'm used to it.nostaw wrote:Sorry... I'm an engineer... I take things literally...Modeler wrote:
John, you're thinking too logically. It was said for humor and must have failed. <hangs head in shame>
JW
Speed costs money, how slow do you want to go?
- Frank
- Frankie BSJ Member
- Posts: 4145
- Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2009 8:54 am
- Jeep Year: 1974
- Jeep Model: CJ5
Re: New sneakers...
Doug : I believe there is a 2" offset to the 10 " rim. I cant believe they would stick out that bad . If you dont like how they look, have them cut for Beadlocks ! You will still have the same back spacing . I like that idea and that gives you an opption for an 8.5 or 9 " rim. I think I read the tire shouldnt be more than three inches wider than the rim , but we all have 12.5s on 8s so theres that answer. Nice grab and good luck. FjR68
- ArticRubi
- BSJ 101 Planning Commitee
- Posts: 690
- Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 5:02 pm
- Jeep Year: 2008
- Jeep Model: JK Wrangler
Re: New sneakers...
Murphy's Law. Rolled the tire off my right front rim on Sunday I have to learn to keep my mouth shut sometimes!ArticRubi wrote:Should be fine on the 10" wide. I run a 35x12.50 on an 18x9" wide rim. Optimal footprint for me is at about 8 psi, and I haven't lost a bead yet.
Question, what up with everyone having a hard-on for 15" rims around here? I know my 18" is a bit tall, and were selected for purposes of highway stability, but even when I go off DD status with my rig and run bead locks I'm still going to need a 17" rim to accomodate my brakes.