$400 for a shock!

You can talk about anything here
User avatar
del_TJ
BSJ 101 Planning Commitee
Posts: 381
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2010 1:19 pm
Jeep Year: 1998
Jeep Model: TJ Wrangler
Location: Newton, MA

$400 for a shock!

Unread post by del_TJ »

This seems like a good idea for a longer travel shock, especially if you're thinking of outboarding rear shocks. But for $400 a shock, i think I'd cry if I busted one!

http://www.6pakrevolution.com/
6pak-product-release-image-LoRes.jpg
6pak-product-release-image-LoRes.jpg (21.53 KiB) Viewed 478 times
The MetalCloak 6Pak™ (Patent Pending 61/520,240) provides the longest shock travel relative to a compressed length for any off-road shock ever built in history, period.

The 6Pak is an alternative to Coil-Over shock performance, with the ease of a factory bolt-on shock.

Lengths/Stroke Available:
GC-1213: $399 each 12" Stroke
GC-1414: $419 each 14" Stroke
GC-1615: $439 each 16" Stroke
User avatar
ZAEDOCK
BSJ Member
Posts: 2427
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 11:18 am
Jeep Year: 1992
Jeep Model: YJ Wrangler

Re: $400 for a shock!

Unread post by ZAEDOCK »

Pay to play!

A Bilstein coil over w/ remote res can run about $500.00 a piece.
Carl McFly wrote:X2, I agree with Joe. And not just because he's man candy
BSJ President 2003 - 2005
User avatar
schwalby
BSJ 101 Planning Commitee
Posts: 1677
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 1:38 pm
Jeep Year: 2003
Jeep Model: TJ Wrangler
Real Name: Josh (Wife is Jen)
Location: Northwood NH

Re: $400 for a shock!

Unread post by schwalby »

So which is better Joe?
Josh Schwalb
ArticRubi wrote:Remember: poor planning on my part constitutes an emergency on yours.
nostaw

Re: $400 for a shock!

Unread post by nostaw »

Looks like a gimick.... You don't get any more travel than a standard shock... Why complicate things?

JW
User avatar
RLVRSK
BSJ 101 Planning Commitee
Posts: 37
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2011 1:04 pm
Jeep Year: 2006
Jeep Model: LJ Wrangler
Location: Bedford, MA

Re: $400 for a shock!

Unread post by RLVRSK »

Bilstein 5150
http://www.quadratec.com/products/16070_303.htm

best bang for the buck.
User avatar
ZAEDOCK
BSJ Member
Posts: 2427
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 11:18 am
Jeep Year: 1992
Jeep Model: YJ Wrangler

Re: $400 for a shock!

Unread post by ZAEDOCK »

RLVRSK wrote:Bilstein 5150
http://www.quadratec.com/products/16070_303.htm

best bang for the buck.
The only 5150 I like is from Van Halen. :banana-guitar:


Seriously though, The heckethorn on my YJ have been there for 15+ years and while they've leaked for about 2, I'll replace them with what is now Trailmaster (NVV or NSS, whatever they're called now).

If I can dig up the coin, the rear link in my buggy will run Fox 2.0's. I'd love to do coilovers, but they just aren't in the budget. As it is, I may have to run a rear SOA or 1/4 elliptical leaves. I'm poor.
On the bright side, if I ever decide to compete, the chasis is pretty simple to modify.

Regarding which is better above - I like simple and less moving parts. The Bilsteins would be the way to go.




You guys think $400.00 is expensive....check out these:

http://www.polyperformance.com/shop/Swa ... -1444.html
Carl McFly wrote:X2, I agree with Joe. And not just because he's man candy
BSJ President 2003 - 2005
User avatar
RLVRSK
BSJ 101 Planning Commitee
Posts: 37
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2011 1:04 pm
Jeep Year: 2006
Jeep Model: LJ Wrangler
Location: Bedford, MA

Re: $400 for a shock!

Unread post by RLVRSK »

also, the Bilstein 5100 for the rear compliments the 5150's in the front. That's what I'm running on my LJ with no sag at all. I suppose you could put 5150's in the rear, but the side gas can might get in the way.
User avatar
ZAEDOCK
BSJ Member
Posts: 2427
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 11:18 am
Jeep Year: 1992
Jeep Model: YJ Wrangler

Re: $400 for a shock!

Unread post by ZAEDOCK »

RLVRSK wrote: That's what I'm running on my LJ with no sag at all.
The shocks have nothing to do with ride height (unless it's an air shock). Any sag would be from the springs.
Carl McFly wrote:X2, I agree with Joe. And not just because he's man candy
BSJ President 2003 - 2005
Post Reply